Based on the
interpretation of Robert E. Strayer, the political and economic power of the
world of the third-wave civilization was more balanced than the modern era. No
region clearly dominated over other regions even when some civilizations were
specialized in the production of certain goods such as China which produced raw
silk. During the age of accelerating connections, trade was the most significant
mechanism to spread goods, ideas, religion, and diseases to other parts of the
world. Each civilization contributed and gained from trading. The political and
economic power was more equally distributed among China, Central Asia, India,
Middle East, and the Mediterranean Basin. In America, connection among
civilizations was less intensive than the connection in Eurasia and no region
wanted to control other civilizations. Even, when there were strong social
inequalities, the relationship among civilizations was more balanced than in
present times. When, then, humans decided that what they produced and what they
received from trading activities was not enough? When did they decide to
control other nations and become the most powerful nation of all?
Through history, we have observed
that rich countries want to control their neighbor countries with the
consistent idea of feeling superior. China, for example, intended to controlled
Korea, Vietnam, and Japan not only to control their resources but because they believed
to be superior contrary to their “barbarians” neighbors. Luckily, Korea and
Japan resisted and maintained themselves as independent nations. Wouldn’t be
beneficial to all if powerful countries help their neighbor countries to prosper?
In the present, the economic and political power lies on one country leading to
profound inequalities among other nations of the world. Perhaps, with the rise
of economic powers as China and India that power can be distributed in more
egalitarian way.
No comments:
Post a Comment